A blog from Cydrannu attendee, Angharad Simmonds, Senior Category Manager within the Procurement Commercial team at Welsh Government.<\/b><\/p>\n
Last week, I attended an informative training session led by subject matter experts, Alistair Smith, UK Public Sector Account Manager and Drew Schlosser, Director & VP, Professional Services from Commerce Decisions. The topic – Effective evaluation criteria writing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n As a procurement practitioner, I\u2019ve always recognised the importance of this, but Drew\u2019s insights really made me reflect on my current practice and the practices I\u2019ve seen. In this blog post, I\u2019ll share the key takeaways from that session, focusing on how we can enhance our evaluation criteria to drive better procurement outcomes.<\/p>\n The Great Subject Matter Expert | <\/strong>Drew\u2019s expertise was evident from the introductions. His passion for procurement (a relatively dry topic at times), was obvious, and his ability to share his knowledge with examples that were translatable meant that I walked away feeling inspired to give this sometimes under-considered area more time and attention in the future.<\/p>\n Time: A Scarce Resource | <\/strong>Drew emphasised the need to allocate sufficient time to crafting evaluation criteria and scoring methodologies. Often, in the rush of procurement processes, we treat this step as a formality. However, Drew reminded us that evaluation criteria are the foundation upon which procurement decisions rest. Rushing through them can lead to less effective outcomes.<\/p>\n Scoring the Right Things | <\/strong>Instead of drowning in an ocean of criteria, focus on what truly matters. Consider the following:<\/p>\n The Scoring Methodology Dilemma | <\/strong>Here\u2019s where Drew really challenged our thinking. Traditionally, we\u2019ve relied on standard scoring methodologies \u2014 often equally weighted. But is this always the best approach? Drew proposed an alternative: a diminishing return scale. Let\u2019s break it down:<\/p>\n Something that is so obvious, but when time is limited, this is often overlooked.<\/p>\n The Right Outcome | <\/strong>The right outcome isn\u2019t just about compliance; it\u2019s about strategic alignment. Our evaluation criteria should align with procurement goals, supplier capabilities, and project success. Sometimes, the standard methodology won\u2019t cut it. Be flexible, adapt, and tailor your approach.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Thanks to Drew\u2019s training session, it\u2019s reinforced my current practices, but also inspired me to look at how I can improve my criteria writing into the future. Investing time, focus on relevance, and always consider the scoring methodologies.<\/p>\n I look forward to the next two sessions, ‘Value for Money’<\/a> and ‘Improve Objectivity in Qualitative Evaluations’<\/a>, something that is so important to us in public procurement to ensure we\u2019re getting the right outcomes for Wales!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A blog from Cydrannu attendee, Angharad Simmonds, Senior Category Manager within the Procurement Commercial team […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":1454,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[59,56,57,58],"class_list":["post-1452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-capacity-and-capability","tag-criteria-writing","tag-cydrannu","tag-evaluation","tag-value-for-money"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n